EY: The Case Against Auditor Rotation Rules
Several countries are adopting rules that limit the number of years a public accounting firm may audit a company's financial statements. EY discusses the threat to quality audits.
Several countries are adopting rules that limit the number of years a public accounting firm may audit a company's financial statements. These so-called audit firm rotation rules are intended to maintain auditor independence and guard against overly close relationships between the auditor and management.
But EY says mandatory rotation increases costs, reduces a company's choice of audit suppliers and can undermine the ability to perform a quality audit.
Click HERE to read the article.
RELATED CONTENT
-
Multiple Choices for Light, High-Performance Chassis
How carbon fiber is utilized is as different as the vehicles on which it is used. From full carbon tubs to partial panels to welded steel tube sandwich structures, the only limitation is imagination.
-
On Electric Pickups, Flying Taxis, and Auto Industry Transformation
Ford goes for vertical integration, DENSO and Honeywell take to the skies, how suppliers feel about their customers, how vehicle customers feel about shopping, and insights from a software exec
-
On Fuel Cells, Battery Enclosures, and Lucid Air
A skateboard for fuel cells, building a better battery enclosure, what ADAS does, a big engine for boats, the curious case of lean production, what drivers think, and why Lucid is remarkable