Published

China and U.S. Manufacturing Job Losses

The EPI finds there have been millions of people put out of work in the U.S. due to competition with China—most in manufacturing
#labor #economics #workforcedevelopment

Share

Here’s a little something that will give people interested in U.S. manufacturing a bit of a pause. According to a piece written by Robert E. Scott, Senior Economist and Director of Trade and Manufacturing Policy Research, Economic Policy Institute, which describes itself as “an independent, nonprofit think tank that researches the impact of economic trends and policies on working people in the United States,” since China became a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO; wto.org) in 2001, there have been 3.7-million jobs lost in the U.S., of which 2.8-million are in manufacturing.

Buick Envision

Guess where the Buick Envision is built. (Image: Buick)

And while it might seem that the efforts being made by the Trump Administration regarding trade with China might be making a significant change, that wasn’t the case during the first two years of the presidency.

That is, according to Scott, “Trade deficits and jobs losses with China continued to grow during the first two years of the Trump administration—despite the administration’s heated rhetoric and imposition of tariffs. The U.S. trade deficit with China rose from $347 billion in 2016 to $420 billion in 2018, an increase of 21.0%. U.S. jobs displaced by those China trade deficits increased from nearly 3.0 million jobs lost in 2016 to 3.7 million jobs lost in 2018, an increase of more than 700,000 jobs lost or displaced in the first two years of the Trump administration.”

EPI job loss data

Trade, of course, is complex. There are no easy “deals,” especially given the supply chains that have been developed, chains that figuratively wrap around the globe.

While some might think that it is only things like consumer electronics that get affected vis-à-vis tariffs with China, take a look under the instrument panel in any contemporary light vehicle and be assured that all of those wires and connectors go to things that weren’t necessarily made in the U.S.

To be sure, efforts must be made. But there needs to be a clear understanding of the risks associated with unintended consequences that can occur as trade adjustments are made.

 

RELATED CONTENT

  • Mazda, CARB and PSA North America: Car Talk

    The Center for Automotive Research (CAR) Management Briefing Seminars, an annual event, was held last week in Traverse City, Michigan.

  • China and U.S. OEMs

    When Ford announced its 3rd quarter earning on October 24, the official announcement said, in part, “Company revenue was up 3 percent year over year, with net income and company adjusted EBIT both down year over year, primarily driven by continued challenges in China.” The previous day, perhaps as a preemptive move to answer the question “If things are going poorly in China, what are you doing about it?, Ford announced that it was establishing Ford China as a stand-alone business unit.

  • Inside Ford

    On this edition of “Autoline After Hours” Joann Muller, Detroit bureau chief for Forbes, provides insights into what she’s learned about Ford, insights that are amplified on the show by our other panelists, Stephanie Brinley, principal analyst at IHS Markit who specializes in the auto industry, and Todd Lassa, Detroit Bureau Chief for Automobile.

Gardner Business Media - Strategic Business Solutions