Published

Tariffs on Autos: “No One Wins”

While talk of tariffs may make the president sound tough and which gives the talking heads on cable something to talk about, the impact of the potential 25 percent tariffs on vehicles imported to the U.S. could have some fairly significant consequences.
#economics

Share

While talk of tariffs may make the president sound tough and which gives the talking heads on cable something to talk about, the impact of the potential 25 percent tariffs on vehicles imported to the U.S. could have some fairly significant consequences—and not positive ones—on both workers and consumers in the U.S., according to Jeff Schuster, President, Americas Operation & Global Vehicle Forecasting, LMC Automotive, one of the leading automotive forecasting organizations on the planet.

Rather than arm-waving and bloviating, Schuster and his colleagues have done the math on what those tariffs could mean, something that the politicians and pundits don’t seem to have done.

According to Schuster, the tariffs could have the following consequences in the U.S.:

“Our partner Oxford Economics estimates that 400,000 jobs would be lost over a three-year period, purely from implementing tariffs on imported vehicles.

“U.S. GDP growth would be cut by 0.5% annually, making fiscal policy more challenging.

“Our volume forecasts for U.S. vehicle sales would decline by up to 11% annually, equivalent to 2 million units, if 100% of the increase from the tariff is added to the price of a vehicle.

“If 50% of the price increase is passed on to consumers, the volume at risk would be 917,000, equivalent to a decline of 5.4% from our base forecast of 17.1 million units.

“Prolonged use of tariffs would put additional downward pressure and risk on the economy and vehicle sales over the next two years, increasing the chances of a recession and potentially converting a soft landing for auto sales into something more severe. In short, there are no winners if the threat of tariffs becomes a reality.”

While it might seem—superficially, anyway—that vehicle imports to the U.S. are all from “foreign” companies, that is not at all the case.

As this chart from LMC Automotive indicates, the traditional Detroit Three—Ford, GM and FCA—all import a nontrivial number of vehicles, and probably the reason why the Ford number is the lowest of the entire group is because the F-Series makes up such a significant part of its overall business.

LMCAutomotive

While it might be good for rhetorical purposes, as Schuster points out, “No one wins with vehicle tariffs.”

Workers—at OEMs and suppliers alike—and consumers are going to be the ones who will lose, according to the LMC Automotive assessment.

RELATED CONTENT

  • On Quantum Navigation, EVs, Auto Industry Sales and more

    Sandia’s quantum navi, three things about EVs, transporting iron ore in an EV during the winter, going underwater in an EV (OK, it is a sub), state of the UK auto industry (sad), why the Big Three likes Big Vehicles, and the future of logistics.

  • On Lincoln-Shinola, Euro EV Sales, Engineered Carbon, and more

    On a Lincoln-Shinola concept, Euro EV sales, engineered carbon for fuel cells, a thermal sensor for ADAS, battery analytics, and measuring vehicle performance in use with big data

  • China and U.S. OEMs

    When Ford announced its 3rd quarter earning on October 24, the official announcement said, in part, “Company revenue was up 3 percent year over year, with net income and company adjusted EBIT both down year over year, primarily driven by continued challenges in China.” The previous day, perhaps as a preemptive move to answer the question “If things are going poorly in China, what are you doing about it?, Ford announced that it was establishing Ford China as a stand-alone business unit.

Gardner Business Media - Strategic Business Solutions