GOP Group Urges “Aggressive” U.S. Fuel Economy Rules
A group of 15 Republican former members of Congress, governors and administrators of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is urging the Obama administration to set "aggressive" fuel economy standards for 2017 through 2025.
#economics
A group of 15 Republican former members of Congress, governors and administrators of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is urging the Obama administration to set "aggressive" fuel economy standards for 2017 through 2025.
The group says an average increase of 6% per year is "achievable and cost-effective" for consumers. At that rate, vehicles sold in the U.S. would be required to average 62 miles per gallon by 2025.
The former Congressman who organized the appeal admits that few of his Republican colleagues currently in office support such a strict target. In April, 18 U.S. senators, all but one of them a Democrat, also endorsed the 62-mpg requirement.
The EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which are scheduled to propose standards by Sept. 30, have said they are considering annual increases of 3%-6%. But automakers say achieving the high end of that range would be too expensive, thus reducing auto sales and eliminating jobs.
RELATED CONTENT
-
On Quantum Navigation, EVs, Auto Industry Sales and more
Sandia’s quantum navi, three things about EVs, transporting iron ore in an EV during the winter, going underwater in an EV (OK, it is a sub), state of the UK auto industry (sad), why the Big Three likes Big Vehicles, and the future of logistics.
-
On Urban Transport, the Jeep Grand Wagoneer, Lamborghini and more
Why electric pods may be the future of urban transport, the amazing Jeep Grand Wagoneer, Lamborghini is a green pioneer, LMC on capacity utilization, an aluminum study gives the nod to. . .aluminum, and why McLaren is working with TUMI.
-
On Global EV Sales, Lean and the Supply Chain & Dealing With Snow
The distribution of EVs and potential implications, why lean still matters even with supply chain issues, where there are the most industrial robots, a potential coming shortage that isn’t a microprocessor, mapping tech and obscured signs, and a look at the future