Ford Challenges Geely on Lynk & Co. Brand Name
Ford Motor Co. claims its 100-year-old Lincoln brand is being infringed by Lynk & Co., the new Volvo-based luxury car line introduced in April by Geely Holding Group.
#legal
Ford Motor Co. claims its 100-year-old Lincoln brand is being infringed by Lynk & Co., the new Volvo-based luxury car line introduced in April by Geely Holding Group.
Ford is challenging Geely’s U.S. trademark application for the brand, asserting that when spoken, “Lynk & Co.” sounds like “Lincoln Co.,” Automotive News reports. Geely hasn’t commented.
Geely launched the Lynk & Co. brand in Shanghai four months ago as a new global line of upscale vehicles to be “sold” on a subscription basis, much as most consumers buy cell phones. Owners will have the option of participating in a scheme to use their vehicles for shared-ride services.
Lynk plans to introduce the 01 crossover in China later this year. An unspecified 02 vehicle is due in mid-2018, to be followed by the 03 small sedan late next year. All three models will share the “compact modular architecture” co-developed by Geely and Volvo.
Geely now aims to introduce the nameplate in Europe and the U.S. in 2019, a year later than initially planned. The company targets combined annual sales of 500,000 units by 2022.
Lynk & CO’s owners are Zhejiang Geely (50%), Geely Automobile (25%) and Volvo (25%). Ford sold Volvo to Geely in 2010.
RELATED CONTENT
-
The Law and Autonomous Cars
Features that enable your car to drive itself are coming to market now, but regulations to govern their performance have lagged, notes Jennifer Dukarski, an attorney with the Butzel Long law firm.
-
U.S. Lawsuit Says Bosch Conspired with VW on Cheater Diesels
A U.S. lawsuit claims Robert Bosch GmbH conspired with Volkswagen AG to equip diesel-powered vehicles with software to cheat emission tests.
-
Ex-FCA Official Pleads Guilty in Labor Training Fund Scandal
Alphons Iacobelli, a former head of labor relations for Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV in the U.S., has pleaded guilty of stealing millions of dollars from an employee training fund.